Sunday, May 22, 2011

Ragtime in Ragtime


In the wake of Coalhouse Walker’s demolition of two fire stations, the citizens of Westchester were terrified. They stopped going to school. They stopped going to work. They even called in the militia from New York City. The only relief that arrived was an accurate picture of Coalhouse in the newspapers. Ever since the second bombing, “Everyone’s most urgent need was to know what Coalhouse Walker looked like” (222). Strangely, while Coalhouse Walker was living in New York, his picture came from a newspaper in St. Louis.
This strange juxtaposition makes more sense when you realize that Coalhouse Walker was a ragtime musician. Ragtime music first appeared around 1896, combining European piano music and traditional African American songs, such as those sung on plantations. It was developed mostly by traveling African American pianists in the South and Midwest, and eventually the hotspot of Ragtime located itself in Missouri. This explains why Coalhouse’s picture can from St. Louis.
As ragtime developed, it gained acceptance among whites and blacks in the United States. Eventually, it was considered America’s first form of popular music. The most well known composer of that time, Scott Joplin, is still played frequently. During his career, he was most famous for his “Maple Leaf Rag,” but is probably most famous today for “The Entertainer.” His influence spread as American bands toured Europe, where ragtime craze spread as well. For example, even the famous Romantic composer Johannes Brahms composed a piece of ragtime.
For twenty-some years, Ragtime enjoyed prominence in America’s homes. By 1920, however, the craze was quickly collapsing. The public had discovered a new type of music: jazz. From then on, ragtime fell into obscurity, but parts of it lived on. Ragtime was essential in the formation of jazz. It helped to bridge the divide between European music, African American tradition, and jazz.
What made ragtime so popular? It’s use of syncopated rhythms in the melody, where the emphasized notes are not played when the audience expects it, contributed greatly to its success. These rhythms helped to create a driving feeling, adding excitement to the piece. In contrast with the melody, the harmony usually held steady, keeping a constant beat. The novel describes “The Maple Leaf” as “syncopating chords and…thumping octaves. This was a most robust composition, a vigorous music that roused the sense and never stood still a moment” (160). Ragtime’s energy and liveliness are apparent in this passage. Doctorow’s diction contributes to the energy: “Thumping octaves” and “vigorous music.” His personification of ragtime makes it seem like the music is alive and moving. In fact, he says it “never stood still.”
As stated earlier, Ragtime was the beginning of truly American music and also served as a transition to the more famous jazz style. In this way, it is representative of the book’s theme of transformation. American culture was transforming from dependence on European creations into self-reliance. In addition, the ragtime music was a creation of African Americans, but eventually gained acceptance by whites. On the way, however, it faced stiff resistant. Similarly, African Americans such as Coalhouse Walker attempted to gain acceptance against a resistant America.

By Mohan Yin

"History of Ragtime." Performing Arts Encyclopedia. Library of Congress, 29 Sept. 2006. Web. 15 May 2011. .

"Ragtime: The Music That Gave Birth to Jazz." Hole in the Wall Books. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 May 2011.


Shehan, Patricia K. "The Riches of Ragtime." Music Educators Journal 73.3 (1986): 22-25. JSTOR. Web. 15 May 2011.

Friday, May 20, 2011

J.P. Morgan’s Travels to Egypt

J.P. Morgan
In the novel Ragtime, E.L. Doctorow uses third person omniscient narration in order to express J.P. Morgan’s opinions. According to the text, Morgan travels around the world in pursuit of something great. Morgan believes that he and Ford, another ruler of the industry, are special and will experience a life after death. Morgan strongly desires a pyramid in Egypt and even has possession of the Great Pharaoh in the secret room of his library; “Morgan’s intention in Egypt was to journey down the Nile and choose a site for his pyramid… He expected that with modern construction techniques, the use of precut stones, steam shovels, cranes and so forth, a serviceable pyramid could be put up in less than three years. The prospect thrilled him as nothing ever had” (E.L. Doctorow, 308). The narrator is all knowing and aware of Morgan’s thoughts and emotions. Also, Doctorow uses details in his writing to further make Morgan’s adventures real: “He dreamed of an ancient life in which he squatted in the bazaars, a peddler exchanging good-natured curses with the dragomans. This dream so disturbed him that he awoke. He became aware of being crawled upon. He stood up. Places all of his body itched” (310). These details appear to be completely true.
Morgan did travel throughout Europe and rode down the Nile. In a New York Times article dated December 31st, 1911, Morgan is reported to have said, “I am going up the Nile from Cairo in a steel dahabeah that I have had constructed after my own ideas of comfort." When the reporter asked for the date of return, Morgan said, "That I do not know as my plans are not definitely fixed. I like Egypt very much and enjoy the Winter climate there." According to this interview, Morgan planned to stay in Egypt due to the appealing winter weather. The book The Great Pierpont Morgan states that in 1877 Morgan and friends spent a year abroad. “In Egypt they chartered a steamer to go up the Nile and had their pictures taken in front of the ruins of Karnak in a group of eighteen—family, friends, doctor, maid, dragoman, waiter, and consular agent—Pierpont standing very straight and solid looking” (Allen, 42). It is evident that Morgan liked to travel and entertain friends. He showed off the steamer that he financed and took trips through Europe. Ragtime expresses J.P. Morgan’s desire to die following his trip to Egypt and Rome; “But he was far from unhappy, having concluded that his physical deterioration was exactly the sign for which he had been waiting” (312). Morgan anticipated his death and was not afraid. It is a fact that J.P. Morgan died in Rome shortly after his trip to Egypt with his daughter. It is also known that Morgan truly did collect old Roman artifacts. “Morgan was a collector of ancient Egyptian relics, classical art, and all kinds of books. The books were eventually donated to the New York Public Library, while the art and relics found their way into New York City's Metropolitan Museum of Art.” He died on March 31, 1913, in Rome, Italy, while returning from a trip to Egypt. However, Morgan was not interested in building his own pyramid, as expressed in the novel. He was accelerating his business abroad and built a home in order to oversee workers that he had hired for his company.
Doctorow incorporated and manipulated these facts pertaining to J.P. Morgan because they express Morgan’s superiority, arrogance and ambition. The novel attributes little to Morgan’s business successes because the book is not business oriented. Major themes of exploration and desire are evident in the novel, and Morgan’s ambition and aspiration to have a pyramid further contribute to these themes. For the most part however, Doctorow’s accounts on J.P. Morgan prove to be true.

By Brooke DeWitt

Baber, Mark. "J. P. MORGAN SAILS; IS GOING TO EGYPT." Encyclopedia Titanica. New
     York Times, 2010. Web. 9 May 2011. .

Allen, Frederick Lewis. The Great Pierpont Morgan. New York: Harper & Brothers
     Publishers, 1949. Print.

Carey, Charles W. "J.P. Morgan Dug Into Egypt's Past." American History Online.
     Facts on File, 2011. Web. 9 May 2011. .

Houdini's Escape of Every Day Life


Harry Houdini is an escape artist, yet he cannot fully escape the sadness caused by his mother’s death. In Ragtime, E.L. Doctorow emphasizes Houdini’s desire to contact his mother after death and discusses Houdini’s newer tricks. Doctorow paints the scene of Houdini suspended upside down in a straitjacket and chains. The author is aware of Houdini’s thoughts when Houdini is being lifted above the thousands of people gathered to watch; “Houdini had lately been feeling better about himself. His grief for his mother, his fears of losing his audience, his suspicions that his life was unimportant and his achievements laughable – all the weight of daily concern seemed easier to bear. He attributed this to his new pursuit, the unmasking of spirit fraud wherever he found it. Driven by his feeling for his sainted mother…” (Doctorow, 315). Houdini’s tricks began to reflect his emotions and helped to liberate him from his life of uncertainty. This theme of freedom is prevalent throughout the novel as Coalhouse searches for freedom along with Younger Brother, Evelyn Nesbit and Emma Goldman, Mother, Harry K. Thaw who is stuck in prison and Tateh who seeks freedom from his life of poverty. 
After his mother’s death, Houdini attempted to talk to her, showing his true belief in magic. According to a New York Times article published in 2010; “In 1922, in Atlantic City, Houdini joined the author Arthur Conan Doyle in a séance led by his wife, Jean Conan Doyle, who tried to contact Houdini’s mother. In a trance, she scrawled pages of writing, Houdini later said, a letter “purported to have been dictated by my sainted mother.” Here, Houdini refers to his mother as sainted, the same word that Doctorow uses to describe her. This shows the authors attention to diction and allows the reader to trust Doctorow. This careful attention to detail gives E.L’s novel Ragtime credibility. The New York Times article also refers to Houdini’s magic as liberating, especially for the influx of Jewish immigrants like Tateh, to the United States in the early 1900s; “The effect was extraordinary. Houdini was publicly proclaiming the possibility of liberation. Wasn’t this, as the exhibition points out, the immigrant’s fantasy as well? It must have been thrilling to watch an enactment of such transcendence, and not just of social obstacles, of course, but of spiritual ones. Even death is overcome by Houdini’s powers.” Houdini achieved extraordinary things, which influenced people in America to strive for liberation and instilled hope. Houdini was in fact Jewish and was an example of the American Dream. He freed himself from the negative connotation that came with being an immigrant and extinguished poverty from his life. The New York Times article later discusses Houdini’s deliberate choice of location for his performances. He often performed the hanging straitjacket tricks in front of windows of ‘metropolitan newspapers’ that captured these events. In the novel Houdini is hanging close to a building in Times Square and even talks to a man in a nearby window. This aspect of his later performances is proven to be true. Houdini gave the American people something great to believe in, and his magic tricks helped him to escape from the problems in his everyday life. Doctorow incorporates Houdini as a way of addressing the overall yearning for mental and physical freedom and ties this theme into the novel through the numerous characters in Ragtime




By Brooke DeWitt

The Jewish Museum, comp. "Houdini: Art and Magic." The Jewish Museum
     Bloomgberg, 27 Mar. 2011. Web. 15 May 2011. 
     .

Rothstein, Edward. "Upside-Down King as Art Muse." The New York Times. The New 
     York TImes Company, 29 Oct. 2010. Web. 15 May 2011. 

Desfor, Irving. "Spiritualists Still Seeking to Contact Houdini's Ghost." The 
     Augusta Chronicle [New York] 31 Oct. 1947: 18. America's Historical 
     Newspapers. Web. 16 May 2011.

    

Ancient Egypt: The Pyramids


          In chapter 17 Doctorow uses ancient Egypt to symbolize the concentration of wealth and power as well as the stratified society that is being challenged by early 20th century America.  The author uses Egypt as a literary device to compare wealthy pharaohs to the successful businessmen of the early 1900s and to show the similarities between the pharaoh’s slaves and today’s poor working class.
       Morgan became fascinated with ancient Egypt perhaps because it was an era of incredible wealth, innovation, and power of its rulers. Its capital was Thebes and “no other city in the world could match it for size for centuries.” Today Thebes is currently known as Luxor and it remains one of the greatest sites of the ancient world.  Morgan is impressed by ancient Egypt- its temples, its pyramids, and the Valley of the Kings (the secret burial ground for the ancient pharaohs). But he is not impressed with his competition, he even thinks of himself as alone atop of “the business pyramid”(137). Morgan is egocentric and wants to build himself his own pyramid. He also believes that his genius has been facilitated by Osiris, the Egyptian God of reincarnation.“To Morgan, the disfigurement of his monstrous nose was the touch of God upon him” (140).





By Colten McCormick

Judd, Denis. "The New Kingdom." A Traveller's Short History of Egypt. Northampton: Interlink Group, 2007. 85. Print.

Tignor, Robert L. "Egypt during the Old Kingdom." Egypt: a Short History. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2010. 42. Print.

Carey, Charles W., Jr. "Morgan, J. P." American Inventors, Entrepreneurs, and Business Visionaries, American Biographies. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2002. American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?
ItemID=WE52&iPin=AIE0187&SingleRecord=True (accessed May 10, 2011).

House of Morgan

J.P Morgan's Library

In E.L. Doctorow’s Ragtime, Coalhouse Walker Jr. attempts to take J.P. Morgan as a hostage in his lavish New York City library in order to broadcast the Coalhouses’ crusade for justice onto a national level of recognition. The library is described as “one of the city’s most celebrated depositories of art,”(267). Coalhouse chooses the library as his target because of the national attention that this building garners. J.P. Morgan is also described as a famous national figure for his immense success in business, expensive lifestyle and vast influence. “Morgan was not the richest man in America, but his influence exceeded that of men like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, who were far wealthier than he.”(fofweb.com) Doctorow attempts to pose Morgan’s library, as an iconic symbol that people look at as untouchable. The Coalhouses want to take over this library because everyone in America sees it as a great public icon and never would dream that it could be taken over by vigilantes. However this element of the novel is not necessarily true. Morgan’s “personal library was made public after his death”(fofweb.com) and therefore it was not as much of a symbol as Doctorow wants to it be. The library was not a public icon by itself. While Americans may not have looked at the capturing of Morgan’s library as overly symbolic for the cause of the radicals, they certainly would have taken notice if J.P. Morgan were taken as a hostage. Perhaps Morgan’s library is meant to be a metaphor for the “House of Morgan” that was established by the combination of several powerful banking firms. Doctorow uses the “House of Morgan” to further the theme of power and domination by the wealthy white elite during this time period. Doctorow may not want readers to look at the capture of Morgan’s library as an isolated incident, but consider the broader implications of a challenge to Morgan’s social supremacy. While Morgan’s power and influence was huge during the early 20th century, the Coalhouses’ takeover of Morgan’s library was not significant to the public because of the library itself, but the broader implications of J.P. Morgan’s House of Morgan being scathed by radical protesters.

By Mac Kelley

Wepman, Dennis. "Morgan, J. P." In Hoogenboom, Ari, and Gary B. Nash, eds. Encyclopedia of American History: The Development of the Industrial United States, 1870 to 1899, Revised Edition (Volume VI). New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2010. American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?
ItemID=WE52&iPin=EAHVI198&SingleRecord=True (accessed May 16, 2011).

Wepman, Dennis. "Morgan, J. P." In Hoogenboom, Ari, and Gary B. Nash, eds. Encyclopedia of American History: The Development of the Industrial United States, 1870 to 1899, Revised Edition (Volume VI). New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2010. American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?
ItemID=WE52&iPin=EAHVI198&SingleRecord=True (accessed May 16, 2011).

Genthe, Arnold. Interior of J.P. Morgan's Library. 1912. Library of Congress.
     Web. 18 May 2011. .

Ferdinand and Houdini



Towards the end of the novel, E.L. Doctorow once again correlates the Archduke Franz Ferdinand and the magician Harry Houdini. These historical allusions have had no factual encounters, yet in Ragtime, E.L. Doctorow seems to place emphasis on and relate the American celebrity to Franz Ferdinand and European royalty. On page 316, Doctorow writes a passage intertwining the two characters’ lives once again: “He [Harry Houdini] was upside down over Broadway, the year was 1914, and the Archduke Ferdinand was reported to have been assassinated. It was at this moment that an image composed itself in Houdini’s mind. The image was of a small boy looking at himself in the shiny brass headlamp of an automobile.” Not only does Doctorow in this passage bring up Ferdinand and Houdini in a similar context for the second time, he also brings up an image from the start of the book when the small boy in the family is looking into Houdini’s headlamps when his car breaks down and he asks the family for help. In the description of Houdini at this moment at the start of the novel, he is described as “in livery” (8) or in military uniform, which draws a parallel between Houdini and the Archduke Ferdinand who in passages past has also been in full military attire. However the greater connection I believe Doctorow is trying to make between the two figures is that both men in their own ways have ignited a flame and been a symbol of a major world event. Houdini, a master magician, was the dominant escape artist and triggered the start of magic as a form of entertainment. He was the first to perform all of the escapes and he is the worldwide emblem of magic and tricks. On the other hand, the Archduke Ferdinand is not only the symbol of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, but also the symbol of the flame that lit the fire of World War I. It was his assassination that ignited the war and he is the dominant portrayal of why the Great War began. Doctorow deliberately repeats the occurrence of a parallel between Ferdinand and Houdini in the novel to emphasize a deeper connection between the two figureheads. Their impact on the world stage is analogized in that they both transformed and exposed the world into something it had never experienced before.


However, in Ragtime, Doctorow seems to emphasize Houdini, the figurehead of magic, over Ferdinand, the figurehead of war. The reason that Doctorow deliberately emphasizes the figurehead of magic over Ferdinand is because Houdini better symbolizes America. Houdini, a great escape artist, has no physical limitations or situations that he cannot break out of which is similar to the all powerful America which Americans believe has seemingly no physical limitations but like Houdini, many emotional limitations that we cannot escape from. Houdini has a very intriguing relationship with his mother and when she dies, he cannot escape the hurt and the feeling of loss. In America, there is an endless supply of emotional limitations and relationships we cannot escape from. We cannot escape war, foreign relations, or internal struggles. So, although Ferdinand exemplifies a major world event that forced American involvement, Houdini is a better representation of the struggles and attempted escapes of our nation.

By Kerry Krause


Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria Source: The Library of Congress - American Memory Published in: The War of the Nations (New York), December 31, 1919 Newspaper Pictorials The war of the nations : portfolio in rotogravure etchings :
Brandon, Ruth. The Life and Many Deaths of Harry Houdini. London, Great Britain: Martin Secker & Warburg Limited, 1993. Print.
Houdini's Lament. N.d. Hilobrow. Matthew Battles in Hilobrow, n.d. Web. 16 May
2011. .

Mexican Revolution

Younger Brother held a peculiar intrigue since the reader’s first introduction to the eccentric man. Initially, he is quite and reserved, and enamored by the sex goddess, Evelyn Nesbit. Towards the end of Ragtime however, the reader sees Younger Brother stand up against Father, thoughts only previously recited in his solitude; “You are a complacent man with no thought of history… The fact that you think of yourself as a gentleman in all your dealings, is the simple self-delusion of all those who oppress humanity… You have traveled everywhere and learned nothing”(E. L. Doctorow, 296-7). Father and Younger Brother clearly have different morals, and while Father’s was dominant in the house, Younger Brother found refuge for his ideas in Coalhouse’s quest for justice. Younger Brother began to spend a lot of time at work, exercising, and planning. To the rest of the family, it was unusual to see him so motivated, he seemed to get over his depression of Evelyn and begun inventing new machines.
Younger Brother was willing to fight for his pent up ideas and opinions about Coalhouses situation; “He had composed an impassioned statement about justice, civilization and the right of every human being to a dignified life”(243). Younger Brother decided to fight for his beliefs by inventing and supplying weapons for the causes he thought just; “I can make bombs, I know how to blow things up”(243). After the entire Coalhouse incident had passed, Younger Brother took the Ford and drove south. Whether on purpose or not, he ended up in Mexico and his actions furthered intrigued the reader, “His clothes had worn away. He wore bib overalls and moccasins and an Indian blanket”(303).

What was he becoming, and why was he in Mexico? Younger Brother had figured out his purpose in life, and believed it was to fight for the Mexican Revolution. His clothes didn’t concern him, women didn’t concern him; his new personality was a stark contrast to the man’s whose house he lived under for so many years. Younger Brother had become a man with one goal, and he passionately followed it. Younger Brother’s metamorphism from a reclusive man to a Zapatista was in fact symbolized by his innovations. He “invented seventeen ordnances devices… they included a recoilless rocket grenade launcher, sonar-directed depth charges, infrared illuminated rifle sights, tracer bullets a repeater rifle, a light weight machine gun…”(317).
Younger Brother’s inventions were all due to the energy he pulled from fighting for individual’s rights. The reason he became a Zapatista was because, “They are not interested in seizing power. What they are interested in is power going back to the people where it rightfully belongs”(Parkins). His weapons became a symbol for freedom and justice. And although many view weapons as obstructions to freedom, Younger Brother made them for individual rights, and was willing to die for it.


By Peter Gilson


Davies, Lynn. "History of the Mexican Revolution." Www.ic.arizona.edu. 12 Mar. 1999. Web. 16 May 2011. .

Keith, Parkins. "Zapatistas." Heureka - Master Index. Sept. 2003. Web. 16 May 2011. .

McLynn, Frank. Villa and Zapata: a Biography of the Mexican Revolution. London: Jonathan Cape, 2000. Print.

Tateh

Tateh came over to America with his wife and daughter with hopes of attaining the American dream. He believed that in America, he could start with nothing and build himself up. Typically, this immigrant mentality fell short to the harsh realities of immigrant life, but in Tateh’s case, he was a true story of a man going from rags to riches. After the death of his wife, Tateh worried about the well being of his beautiful daughter and wondered if she’d be able to grow up without a mother. In fact, his passionate sense of responsibility and love for his daughter brought him to wealth. He created a flipbook of images that simulated a moving picture in order to entertain her. This gift brought him into the hands of Franklin Novelty Company, and eventually the movie business.
When Mother first sees Tateh, or Baron Ashkenazy as he is now known, he had a; “glass rectangle [that] was a tool of the trade which he could not forbear using even when on vacation”(254). This “peculiar rectangular glass”(255) could have been any type of camera from around 1910, but the fact that Doctorow doesn’t specify, makes Tateh’s accomplishments all the more fantastical. With his camera, Tateh sees life through a different lens, literally and figuratively. During the dinner between Tateh and his daughter, and Father’s family, Tateh is described as “ebullient” and “life excited him. He dwelled on his own sensations and like to talk about them”(255). Tateh seems to view life through his camera lens; he is filled with enthusiasm and intrigue, and his jovial emotions infect those around him.
Cameras at the time were for those solely in the business, and represented professionalism and prestige. So why did Tateh succeed where so many other immigrants fell short? The camera symbolized his motivation and persistent attitude through life, not just after he received the camera. He viewed life through the camera lens since his touchdown in America. Despite his transformation from a rugged and disorientated man to elegant and energetic Baron in light of his new job, it was just a physical change. Right from the start, Tateh’s vision had been; “he would buy her light and sun and clean wind of the ocean for the rest of her life”(259). The glass rectangle represented Tateh’s persistent personality and was a tribute to his determination. The reason the “preposterous frame”(257) was so significant to Tateh was because it captured moments in time. This ability to look into the past was especially important to Tateh so he could look back and see how he’d risen amongst such opposition.


By Peter Gilson

Dirks, Tim. "Film History Before 1920." Greatest Films - The Best Movies in Cinematic History. AMC. Web. 10 May 2011. .

Willsberger, Johann. The History of Photography: Cameras, Pictures, Photographers. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1977. Print.

Greenspun, Phillip. "History of Photography Timeline - Photo.net." Photography Community, including Forums, Reviews, and Galleries from Photo.net. Namemedia Photography Inc. Web. 10 May 2011. .

Father's Final Mission



Doctorow ends Ragtime with a wrap up on each of the characters. One of the more intriguing endings to the characters is that of Father. The narrator says that Father was one of the Americans on the Lusitania who lost their lives. The ship was said to be a merchant ship that left New York for Liverpool on May 1, 1915. A few days later, the ship got closer to Europe, where German U-boats then torpedoed it. It was later revealed that the Lusitania was secretly carrying explosives from the United States to the British, to help them in their war against Germany. The narrator said that Father was the one overseeing the passage of the weapons to Britain, which “undoubtedly contributed to the monstrous detonations in the ship that preceded its abrupt sinking”(318). The narrator also turns to first person right after that for the first time in the book. The use of “I” in the paragraph following Father’s death draws extra attention to this passage and gives more life to the text. It is interesting that Doctorow decides to include Father in this pivotal part of American history. Many argue that the sinking of the Lusitania was one of the primary reasons for pushing America towards joining the First World War. Citizens were upset that American lives had been lost, and said that it was time to take down the Germans. The problem with this is that America wasn’t really neutral at that time. The government was supplying the British with weapons, so the Germans did have reason to shoot down the ship. However, those details were lost in the propaganda following the sinking, and Father’s reason for being on the ship was forgotten in history. Once again, Doctorow is using his characters as tools to tie in specific historical events into his plot line. Here, he is putting Father in an important position that makes him a vital part of American history. Father, a man who found success in America, ends up dying by the thing that brought him his fortune. Doctorow re-writes what happened so that he could include Father into America’s joining WWI.  This continues with the theme of American international affairs that is prominent throughout the story.

By Henry Bird

Lost Liners - Lusitania. PBS, n.d. Web. 16 May 2011.
     lostliners/lusitania.html#top>.

"The Lusitania Sunk One Year Ago Today." New York TImes 7 May 1916: n. pag. 
     The New York Times. Web. 16 May 2011.
     archive-free/pdf?res=F00614FD3F5D17738DDDAE0894DD405B868DF1D3>.

O'Sullivan, Patrick. The Lusitania: Unraveling the Mysteries. N.p.: Sheridan 
     House Inc., 2000. Print.

JP Morgan and Egypt


      In Ragtime, J.P. Morgan is incorporated into the novel to address the theme of class as well as the theme of “Capitalism vs Anarchism.” E.L. Doctorow states that J.P. Morgan was “at the top of the business pyramid.”(137)
As well as foreshadowing his obsession with Egypt, Doctorow continues to show the reader just how much wealthier and more sophisticated Morgan was than the rest of his peers, “he was the monarch of the invisible, transnational kingdom capital whose sovereignty was everywhere granted.” His only fault was the “ironic skin disease that had colonized his nose.”
E.L. Doctorow used Morgan to signify the goods and evils of capitalism, just as he used Berkman and Goldman exemplified the goods and evils of anarchism. Morgan is a true capitalist. While Morgan “controlled 741 directorships in 112 corporations” Goldman traveled in exile and preached anarchism to anyone who would listen.
Despite his prosperity and wealth, Morgan could not find happiness. He needed something to stimulate his brilliant mind. And when he started to become more and more interested in ancient Egypt, he simply threw some money together and single handedly funded one of the most expensive expeditions of all time. When he heard the theory of “colony from the gods who are regularly born in every generation to assist mankind” he thought that he was the god of his generation. And this is what drove him to spend so much of his time and energy exploring and excavating ancient Egyptian ruins.
After excessive research, I have found little more information on his adventure to Egypt than that he, “wore a big sun helmet, a flannel suit and tan shoes.” (J.P. MORGAN
DUC DUG…) The lack of historical evidence of his discoveries, although disappointing, is parallel to the text.Doctorow makes it clear that Morgan found nothing in his excavation of Egypt, and died before returning to the United States, seemingly due to lack of motivation to live.


By Tabor Edwards



J. P. MORGAN SAILS; IS GOING TO EGYPT New York Times (ref: #6048, accessed 10th May 2011 06:53:20 PM)
URL : http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/j-p-morgan-sails-for-egypt.html

J. P. MORGAN DUG INTO EGYPT'S PAST New York Times (ref: #6116, accessed 10th May 2011 06:34:18 PM)
URL : http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/j-p-morgan-dug-into-egypt-past.html

Beao. JohnPierpontMorgan. N.d. wikipedia . Web. 16 May 2011.
.

Wepman, Dennis. "Morgan, J. P." In Hoogenboom, Ari, and Gary B. Nash, eds. Encyclopedia of American History: The Development of the Industrial United States, 1870 to 1899, Revised Edition (Volume VI). New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2010. American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/


Father Goes to the Ballpark

In Chapter 30 of E.L. Doctorow’s Ragtime, the Father takes his son to a baseball game. The son is truly eager about going, and you can tell he’s a big fan of the game. When someone asks him who is pitching, he replies “Rube Marquard, He’s won his last three chances.”(Doctorow 227) Father on the other hand did not seem excited to go. Doctorow used diction to show that even before the game begins, the father is not excited to be at the game.

Because of his expedition to the Arctic, Father obviously hadn’t seen a baseball game for years. Doctorow uses the game as a literary tool to symbolize the changes in America during Father’s absence. The thing he most despised about this “new” baseball was the number of immigrants that played on each team. As we know, the early 1900s immigration spiked as shown in figure 1. Father’s disgust was not uncommon for conservative thinkers at this time.

Doctorow uses language to show Ffathers concern for the changes that have taken place in baseball, as well as the changes that have taken place in the country as a whole. Doctorow says that the “cavern of air in which he sat pressed upon (him)as if by a foul universe.” (231) The father views the stadium, as crowded, uncomfortable, filled with rude drunk fans screaming their heads off. This reflects his view of America. Father has always been a traditional conservative thinker. He is incompetent when it comes to dealing with change.

One of the things that disturbs Father the most, is the scoreboard. When father saw the man that “went along a scaffold and hung the appropriate marked shingles that summarized the action” he “sunk into his chair”(231) in disappointment. This represents his view towards the rapidly changing technology of the time. The early 1900s was a time of innovation. Not only were new devices invented everyday, but electronics were also becoming more and more available to common people. Traditional Father wants no part in this.

The reason Doctorow puts this chapter in Ragtime is because this passage serves the role of expressing to the readers, not only a view on one of the major themes in the novel, immigration, but to show the view of Father, and how he feels about the rapidly changing America.


By Tabor Edwards

"Marquard, Rube." National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum. N.p., n.d. . 19

May 2011. .

Ritter, Lawrence S. The Glory of Thier Times. N.p.: n.p., September 1966. Print.

"Immigration to the United States." American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?

ItemID=WE52&iPin=AMHC0439&SingleRecord=True (accessed May 19, 2011).

The Right Way to Address Black Inequality


Doctorow deliberately brings Booker T. Washington into the story at the end of the novel, Ragtime, as juxtaposition to Coalhouse. Booker T. Washington was a famous black activist; he was in fact the first African American to have dinner at the White House. Booker T. Washington’s way to fight racial issues was really different from Coalhouse’s way of achieving equality. This difference between the two begs the question: what was the right way to address racism? Booker T. Washington fought peacefully for the inclusion of black people in industries and in education. He believed that African Americans should be friendly towards white people instead of using violence. He also believed that white Americans were not ready to accept the fact that blacks were just as intelligent and capable as they are. He was a great orator and used his skills to convince blacks that they could be respected by working up the ladder and succeeding in industrial fields. “Cast down your bucket where you are” (1895 Atlanta Compromise Address), he said. Blacks had the resources to succeed; they just needed to know how to use them.

On the other hand, Coalhouse uses violence to fight for his equality. He does totally the opposite of what Booker T. Washington wants his people to do. Booker T. says, “We are faced with a desperately brainsick man” (Ragtime 285) Washington is identifying with the white people when he says “We” and he calls Coalhouse a “brainsick man”. Doctorow uses hyperbole to describe Coalhouse’s attitude. The fact that Washington is successful, both in his approach to gaining racial respect and appealing to the public, makes Coalhouse the public enemy. The fact that Coalhouse is unsuccessful in getting what he wants and also because he is brutally shot at the end shows that his way of fighting for black equality was wrong and that he accomplished very little. Booker T. Washington’s success versus Coalhouse’s failure, promotes peaceful fighting for the black rights and shows negative aspects of the use of violence.

By Kevin Roy


Smock, Raymond. Booker T. Washington: “Black leadership in the age of Jim Crow”. The library of African-American biography. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, c2009

Spencer, Samuel R. “Booker T. Washington and the Negro’s place in American life”. The Library of American biography. Boston, Little, Brown. 1995.

Norrell, Robert J. Booker T. Washington. Up from History: The life of Booker T.

Washington. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Cover Page. Print.

Change in Ragtime

Doctorow addresses a lot of social changes in the book Ragtime, and he does it through the reaction of his characters. Starting in the 1900s and so on, the society and the norms were in constant change. African Americans were trying to fight for their equality with creation of groups like the NAACP that was created in 1909. Those groups were fighting for the civil rights, education and the equality of black people in the community. Other important movements were the ones fighting for the recognition of women. Through the feminist movements, women were able to have more importance in everyday life and in the industries. Women were determined to have more importance than just being mothers and staying at home taking care of their children. They wanted to take action in the political and industrial life. In Ragtime, Doctorow talks about those changes through the thoughts of characters such as Father and Mother. After Father’s return, Mother is happy because she has more responsibilities and she proved to Father that she could do everything he does. “Mother could now speak crisply of such matters as unit cost, inventory and advertising. She had assumed executive responsibilities.”(112) She knows what she is doing and she is more confident because she speaks “crisply” of unit cost and she “assumed responsibilities". While Mother is really happy about the changes, Father has a hard time accepting it. “Everything she had done stood up under his examination. He was astounded.” Father is “astounded” and surprised of that changes, he cannot accept it. Father also cannot accept the inclusion of Coalhouse into the community. So through the thoughts of his characters, the reader can understand what was going on at that time and how it was hard for some men to accept the fact that women started to play a bigger role in the society.


By Kevin Roy


Boyer, Paul S. The Enduring Vision: A history of the American People. Concise Sixth Edition. Wadsworth Cendage Learning, Boston.

Layton, Utah. NAACP: Celebrating a century: 100 years in pictures/NAACP and the crisis magazine. Gibbs Smith, 2009.

Discovery Education. Women of the Century, 1900s. Social Studies. U.S department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (www.discoveryeducation.com)


Thursday, May 19, 2011

Tateh to Baron




              Who is Baron Ashkenazy? It is Tateh after metamorphosing into a wealthy filmmaker. “It got him around in a Christian world. Instead of having to erase his thick Yidish accent he only needed to roll it off his tongue with a flourish” (259). There is no Baron Ashkenazy in real life, so presumably Tateh did not exist. Doctorow made a statement with Tateh’s name. Ashkenazim are Jewish people who settled in Central or Eastern Europe. Ashkenazi, the singular form, is very similar to Ashkenazy. The irony is lost on Mother, but to the reader it is an interesting blend of who Tateh is, and who he used to be.
This name reminds the reader that Tateh may not be completely transformed: “Sometimes he suffered periods of trembling in which he sat alone in his room smoking his cigarettes without a holder, slumped and bent over in defeat like the old Tateh. But his new existence thrilled him.” (258) Tateh is an allegory of the rags to riches story. He started in the slums of New York City and has moved to Atlantic City. The juxtaposition of the two cities juxtaposes the American dream with the nouveux riches Tateh and the poor Tateh.
                Doctorow does not have real names for his characters, and the hint that Tateh does not have a real name informs the reader that he is fictional. It is important that he represents a “rags to riches” story. Doctorow uses a metonym to name Tateh, but as his character grows and changes so does the name. It is like a film; the plot of Tateh’s life is being recorded. The rapid progression of film in this era is also p a ortrayed through Tateh, who has transformed or metamorphosed from a sad, grim man into an ebullient character.
             A cross-reference, to the Lusitania being sunk, gives a time reference of May in 1915. This is important because it is a direct time reference. As a time reference it also is a cultural indicator. The United States was involved, but not fighting, in WWI. The movies that the Baron mentioned do not exist. His First Mistake and A Daughter’s Innocence are purely reflections of his life. In this time era film making was becoming a lucrative business. A quick search of film in the magazine Life shows the amount of filming taking place. Things as trivial as a shark attack were filmed for the thrill value. Therefore, Doctorow used a realistic vehicle for Tateh’s success. Tateh’s success is one of many motifs in the story. 


By Elyse Curtis 


Ashkenazim, n.
Second edition, 1989; online version March 2011. ; accessed 09 May 2011. First published in A Supplement to the OED I, 1972.


Roberts, Priscilla. "sinking of RMS Lusitania." In Tucker, Spencer C., gen. ed.Encyclopedia of American Military History. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2003.American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?
ItemID=WE52&iPin=EMHII0219&SingleRecord=True (accessed May 9, 2011).


Shark Fight Filmed. Atlanta, GA, United States:, 1914. ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The Atlanta Constitution (1868-1945). Web. 10 May 2011.

Bess Houdini


       


        Houdini is a very interesting character in Ragtime. Doctorow is using him as an element to convey themes. The biography Doctorow creates for Houdini is not completely accurate. He is seen as a magician traveling the country and world, daring himself to be better than he can be, while also pursuing a connection with his deceased mother. Doctorow excludes the existence of Harry’s wife Beatrice. They were married in 1894, well before the story of Ragtime takes place. I think this is because Doctorow did not want a third conflicting female image. With Goldman, Mother, and Nesbit, he is showing the change in stereotypes and personalities of women in the era. How would a wife of Houdini fit in? He was an entrepreneur of his time, and wife would have only complicated the situation.
            If Beatrice were in the piece it would be hard to imagine how she would complicate the novel. It would have interrupted with the sense of freedom that Houdini exhibits. He was the master of escape, and a marriage would have complicated this.
“His life was absurd. He went all over the world accepting all kinds of bondage and escaping. He was roped to a chair. He escaped. He was chained to a ladder. He escaped. He was handcuffed, his legs were put in irons, he was tied up in a straightjacket, he was tied up in a straight jacket and put in a locked cabinet. He escaped…. His escapes were mystifying because he never appeared damaged or appeared to unlock what he escaped from” (Doctorow, 7). 
         The anaphora Doctorow uses leaves no ambiguity that Houdini was escaping to a freed life. He even manages to escape his real name Erich Weiss, by simply changing it to Harry Houdini. I think, in a sense, if Houdini had been married in the novel, it would have been a bond that he could not have escaped from.



By: Elyse Curtis



"Harry Houdini." Encyclopedia of World Biography. Detroit: Gale, 1998. Gale Biography In Context. Web. 16 May 2011.


"Harry Houdini." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica, 2011. Web. 16 May. 2011. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/272947/Harry-Houdini>.


Sahlman, Rachel. "Harry Houdini." SPECTRUM Home & School Magazine. [http://www.incwell.com/Spectrum.html] 16 May. 2011. © K. B. Shaw

Monday, May 16, 2011

J.P. Morgan

In Ragtime, E.L. Doctorow makes a point to introduce J.P. Morgan and his ever-evolving nose. His nose, known to be the result of a chronic skin disease called rosacea, grew larger and larger as he accumulated more and more wealth. Doctorow’s development of the historical allusion of Morgan’s nose seems to coincide and be yet another example of the book’s larger motif of transformation. His nose was represented as a cluster of strawberry blemishes that had “…colonized his nose…” (139). The disease had come to Morgan when he was just beginning his career as a superior American financier and banker and “as he grew older and richer the nose grew larger” (139). And although Mr. Morgan thought that his nose had become a hideous focal point on his face, he admired it and found it oddly soothing. To him, the additional bloom of a scarlet bulge on his nose only meant that his successes and riches had somehow become even more colossal and titanic and furthered his transformation into one of the most powerful men in the world. This perverted relationship with an awful sore on his nose seems to be backed up by historical evidence that he also had a very unhealthy relationship and control over the nation’s money and credit. Yet even though J.P. Morgan sought fulfillment through financial and industrial domination, the blemishes covering the surface of his nose were a constant reminder of mortality for him. The “monstrous nose” was “the steadiest assurance he had” (140). The growing pimples reminded him of his humanity and that at some point this would all come to an end. As Doctorow describes Morgan’s self doubt and contradicting satisfaction that the nose brings he also brings up the literary allusion of Nathaniel Hawthorn’s The Birthmark, Morgan’s favorite story. It tells the tale of a young, beautiful, girl with just one birthmark on her cheek. The woman’s husband makes her a potion that is supposed to rid her of the marking, and when she drinks it, her birthmark slowly disappears and as the last remnants of the birthmark dark across her face fade away, she dies. Doctorow’s allusion to this story is puzzling in that Morgan’s physical imperfection is something he is proud of and is a constant reminder to him of his surplus of wealth and his limitless life. Yet it is also a reminder that someday it will come to an end and it seems strange because his life is so luxurious, but he is not afraid to die. The hideous nose is key in reminding him of that mortal factor but it also must be satisfying in that it reminds him of his infinitely growing wealth that is transforming American business and industry. The fact that Doctorow brings up such an insignificant aspect of Morgan’s face brings up another common theme throughout the novel. All of the tiny details that Doctorow purposefully mentions and describes about each character helps strengthen the overall character development of the novel and taps into the characters’ psychological processes and further intensifies and reinforces the themes, and specifically the common thread of transformation of character, throughout the novel.


Kerry Krause




Kohn, George Childs. "J. P. Morgan, business practices and." The New Encyclopedia of American Scandal. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2001. American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?
ItemID=WE52&iPin=EAS0351&SingleRecord=True (accessed May 9, 2011).


Wepman, Dennis. "Morgan, J. P." In Hoogenboom, Ari, and Gary B. Nash, eds. Encyclopedia of American History: The Development of the Industrial United States, 1870 to 1899, Revised Edition (Volume VI). New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2010. American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?
ItemID=WE52&iPin=EAHVI198&SingleRecord=True (accessed May 9, 2011).


Chernow, Ron. The House of Morgan: An American Banking Dynasty and the Rise of 
     Modern Finance. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1939. Print.

Coalhouse's Revenge

One of the most important characters in Doctorow’s Ragtime is Coalhouse Walker, a successful black pianist, and the father of the Sarah’s baby. The initial reader response to Coalhouse is very positive. He is a successful African American in a time when the black race suffered from intense racial discrimination. He is an example of how African Americans can be well-educated, civilized members of society. Mother says that Coalhouse “is well spoken, and conducts himself as a gentleman,”(158) thus creating an even more positive image of Coalhouse. The reader supports his fight for justice against the firehouse chief, who vandalized Coalhouse’s new Model T. The reader appreciates his initial nonviolent approach to the situation, but the death of Sarah results in a complete change in Coalhouse. There is a distinct contrast created in the reader’s mind due to this juxtaposition of Coalhouse. Suddenly his actions become violent, forming a gang and bombing the firehouse. Coalhouse has instantly become the villain. This drastic change provokes the question as to whether or not there were violent black gang’s like this that made public attacks in the early 1900s. People know all about the KKK, a white supremacist group that was known for lynching African Americans, but were there any black groups that retaliated? Very little suggests that any sort of violent reaction came from the black crowd in the early 1900s. That was more of a time where African Americans were still creating their own community and their own identity. The first real violence seen from the black community was in the 1960’s with the Black Panther Party. An organization following Malcolm X’s ideals, the Black Panther Party “demanded [their] constitutions rights, and demanded that [their] basic needs be fulfilled.” The Watts Riots in Lost Angeles were also examples of African American violence. The whole idea of Coalhouse and his gang was a little ahead of their time, but Doctorow uses this detail to add to the reoccuring theme of change in American society.

By Henry Bird

Seale, Bobby. Seize the Time: the Story of the Black Panther Party and Huey P.
     Newton . N.p.: Black Classic Press, 1991. Print.

Simkin, John. "Ku Klux Klan." Spartacus Educational. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 May 2011.
     .

"Watts Riots." pbs.org. Luna Ray Films, 2002. Web. 9 May 2011.
     .

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Alexander Berkman



The anarchist couple of Berkman (left)
and his wife Goldman smile for a photo.


In the 8th Chapter of Ragtime, Emma Goldman recounts her love story with Alexander Berkman. Doctorow uses historical allusions to tie together accurate historic accounts of Berkman with the plot and themes of the novel. A common theme regarding Berkman is Anarchism vs. Capitalism. Goldman recounts the story of Berkman assassinating Frick, to tell the reader more about his and her view on anarchism. To understand Emma Goldman, and to thus understand the novel it is important to know Alexander Berkman’s story. Berkman was born in Europe, and after his father died, moved to Lithuania and then into the United States. He thought he was going to find freedom in the United States but found it to be more oppressive even than governments in Soviet Russia. He was convinced that “wealthy corporate leaders owned the American political system.” He made it his life goal to stop this. He participated in numerous labor strikes and preached anarchism until the day he and his passionate lover Emma decided to murder the general manager of Carnegie Steel Company, Henry Frick. His failed attempt was described thoroughly by Doctorow. In jail, Berkman wrote The Prison Memoirs of an Anarchist that was published just after he was released from jail. Once freed he published an anarchist paper The Blast, and protested the draft of World War I. He and his wife were eventually deported to Russia for protesting on the behalf of mistreated criminals. Berkman appears many times in the next few years in American history, it will be interesting to see if E.L. Doctorow bring his character back into the plot.
By Tabor Edwards
Hamilton, Neil A. "Berkman, Alexander." American Social Leaders and Activists, American Biographies. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2002. American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp? ItemID=WE52&iPin=ASL029&SingleRecord=True (accessed April 26, 2011).

"Alexander Berkman with Emma Goldman." National Archives and Records Administration. American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?

ItemID=WE52&iPin=AHI0189&SingleRecord=True


Aurand, Harold W. "labor radicals during the Gilded Age." In Hoogenboom, Ari, and Gary B. Nash, eds. Encyclopedia of American History: The Development of the Industrial United States, 1870 to 1899, Revised Edition (Volume VI). New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2010. American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?

ItemID=WE52&iPin=EAHVI166&SingleRecord=True (accessed May 2, 2011).

Matthew Henson, African American Explorer of the North Pole



Matthew Alexander Henson, a talented African-American explorer who accompanied Peary to the North Pole and many other expeditions during the early 1900s, is still recognized today as one of the most renowned explorers ever. Henson and Peary are considered the first in history to reach the North Pole. Henson’s success helped to reduce racial tensions in America and to change the perception of the roles of blacks in society.
Henson is a symbol of the rapid transformation of society during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. At the beginning of the book Ragtime, Doctorow tells us, “there were no Negroes. There were no immigrants” (4). But by page 80 Matthew Henson accompanies Peary to the North Pole (while Father, a white explorer, is sent back to the boat). And by the end of this passage Peary takes a picture of Henson and the Eskimos and the author describes them as “indistinguishable” (81), suggesting a reshaping of society and the roles people play.
On the one hand the change is exciting and revolutionary, but on the other hand it is very unsettling. “On this watery planet the sliding sea refused to be fixed” (80). Doctorow uses a beautiful scientific allusion of the fluid, yet unstable and unsafe future of America. Peary measures persistently, trying to find the “exact” location of the North Pole, but is unsatisfied again and again, suggesting people’s difficulty of finding their place in an ever-changing society. This motif appeared earlier in the novel when the novelist Theodore Dreiser moved his chair around the room (26), in dissatisfaction, trying to find his right place.

By Colten McCormick

Henson, Matthew. N.d. American History Online. Library of Congress, n.d. Web. 5
May 2011.

Morrissey, Katherine G. "Biography." American National Biography. Oxford
University Press, 2000. American National Biography Online. Web. 26 Apr.
2011.
"Henson, Matthew." American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?
ItemID=WE52&iPin=afph0188&SingleRecord=True (accessed April 28, 2011)

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Touching Down to the Duke

E.L. Doctorow adverted to many historical allusions in his novel Ragtime. Most frequently he mentions the great magician Harry Houdini, and as we progress further into the novel and further into the twentieth century, he gets introduced to the Archduke Franz Ferdinand. “Sitting in the car was the Archduke Franz-Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne. The Archduke was dressed in the uniform of a field marshal of the Austrian Army. …. The Archduke Franz Ferdinand didn’t seem to know who Houdini was. He congratulated him on the invention of the aeroplane” (105). Although Ferdinand wasn’t aware, Houdini was a native Hungarian and had been in Germany performing all over the country since he had arrived in May of 1900. In Houdini’s shows throughout Germany he had become more and more popular and it seems strange to think that a man of such a high position as Archduke wasn’t aware of the popular performer. Ferdinand asked Houdini to do a demonstration flight for them. This occurred during the time period when the airplane was invented and the Archduke, dressed in military attire, probably had hidden initiatives for seeing how the plane functioned as he was aware that tensions were mounting between European nations and although he had no idea that this hostility was going to erupt into World War I, he must have known or been encouraged to prepare for a possible showdown. The scene set up by Doctorow seems odd because there is no record of Ferdinand and Houdini ever interacting. Three days after Houdini returned from Europe, the heir to the throne was assassinated and an intricate system of alliances ignited World War I. However, this connection could possibly resemble another escape by Houdini. He left Europe just in time to escape epic disaster between a multitude of European countries. In turn, Houdini’s escape, in a larger sense, reflects America’s attempted escape and neutrality throughout the brutal Great War. It was an escape from casualties, foreign conflict, and destruction that later proved to be inevitably inescapable in order for America to exist in a freely democratic world.

By Kerry Krause

Brandon, Ruth. The Life and Many Deaths of Harry Houdini. London, Great Britain: Martin Secker & Warburg Limited, 1993. Print.

Kalush, William, and Larry Sloman. The Secret Life of Houdini: The Making of America’s First Superhero. New York, NY: Atria Books, 2006. Google Books. Web. 27 Apr. 2011. ‌books? id=mIV7qFYpRNcC&pg=PA309&lpg=PA309&dq=houdini+ and+archduke+ ferdinand&source =bl&ots=3NB0sVtFWF&sig=b_uIbl8wkw

FkH_rAlbDJJLFrfEE&hl=en&ei= XAi3TZPpIc24 tweA8oWfAQ&sa=X&oi=

book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=houdini

and archduke ferdinand&f=false>.

Freund, Steve. "Houdini, Harry." In Faue, Elizabeth, and Gary B. Nash, eds. Encyclopedia of American History: The Emergence of Modern America, 1900 to 1928, Revised Edition (Volume VII). New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2010.American History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?

ItemID=WE52&iPin=EAHVII109&SingleRecord=True (accessed April 27, 2011).